Diplomatic Interactions

Diplomatic Interactions

Factors Affecting the Roots of Alliances in the Middle East: The Need to Revise the Theory of Alliances in International Relations

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Theorizing the root of the alliance's concept and balancing is considered one of the most important topics in the science of international relations. The most prominent of these theories is presented in the framework of mainstream logic in international relations (rationalism). In other words, the unity and balancing concept is considered to be one of the main key concepts of the realist rationalist trend in international relations, which is theorized with an approach that looks at components such as power, threat, and benefit, and in the framework of an external, objective, material, structural, etc. view. On the other hand, the Middle East is one of the most important regions in the world, which has witnessed numerous alliances between regional and extra-regional powers in the years after 2011. Therefore, in this research, we have tried to look at the roots of alliances in the Middle East after the Arab uprisings. The question is: What components and variables affect alliances and balances in the Middle East? By using the analytical-explanatory method and with a case study of the roots of alliances in the balancing efforts of Syria, Iraq, the axis of resistance, and Yemen after 2011, the authors have found that "Alliances in the Middle East despite being influenced by structural, rational, objective, power-oriented and material elements which the mainstream of international relations validates in examining the roots of alliances and balances; It is also influenced by mental, normative, identity, cultural and emotional developmental variables. Therefore, it seems that the mainstream of international relations does not have the necessary sufficiency to analyze the root of alliances in the Middle East. The strong presence of immaterial and formative elements such as culture, emotion, and identity at the alliance's root in the Middle East shows that only paying attention to the structural, objective, and material components at the alliance's root in the Middle East is not enough and it seems necessary to review and reinterpret the theorization of alliances in international relations.
Keywords

فارسی

توسیدید، ت. (1378). تاریخ جنگهای پلوپونزی، ترجمه: محمدحسن لطفی. تهران: نشر خوارزمی.
گریفیتس، م. (1391). نظریۀ روابط بینالملل برای سدۀ بیست و یکم: ترجمۀ علیرضا طیب. تهران: نشر نی.
لطفی، م.، و نورمحمدی، م. (1400). استمرار بحران در یمن و ریشه‌های درونی آن. فصلنامۀ علمی مطالعات سیاسی جهان، 10(3)، 131-111.
منوچهری، ع. و دیگران. (1387). رهیافت و روش در علوم سیاسی. تهران: نشر سمت.
مورگنتا، ه. (1374). سیاست میان ملتها، ترجمه: حمیرا مشیرزاده. تهران: دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بینالمللی.
همتی، م.، ابراهیمی ، ش.، و گودرزی، م. (1399). سیاست موازنه سازی عربستان در برابر ایران در یمن. برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، 1(36)، 105-122.
هوشی سادات، م. (1399). تاریخ سیاسی-اجتماعی خاورمیانه: از عصر قدیم تا پساعصر جدید. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
والتز، ک. (1392). نظریۀ سیاست بینالملل، ترجمه: غلامعلی چگنیزاده و داریوش یوسفی. تهران: اداره چاپ و انتشارات وزارت امور خارجه.

References

 Ahmed, N. (2019). Yemeni Civil War: Causes, Consequences, And Prospects. Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan, 2(2), 82-91.
Al Alarabiya. (2012, March). Hamas rattles the Resistance Axis. Retrieved April 2022, from Al Alarabiya News: http://english.alarabiya.net/views/2012/03/03/198264.html
Aljazeera. (2014, May 2). The Role of Hezbollah in Syria’s War. Retrieved April 2022, from Aljazeera: https://www.aljazeera. com/news/2014/5/2/the-role-of-hezbollah-in-syrias-war
Almahamid, Y. (2021). Religion and the Syrian War: A Qualitative Research on the Role of Religion in the Syrian War. Norwegian University of Life Since {Master’s Thesis 2021}, 1-58.
Barzegar, K. (2010). The Balance of Power in the Persian Gulf: An Iranian View. belfercenter, Harvard University, 12 p.
Blanton, S. L., & Kegley, C. W. (2011). World Politics: Trend and Transformation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Cîrlig, C.-C. (2015). The international coalition to counter ISIL/Da'esh (the 'Islamic State'). European Parliamentary Research Service, 12 p.
Conesa, P. (2018). The Saudi Terror Machine: The Truth About Radical Islam and Saudi Arabia Revealed. New York: Allworth.
Darwich, M. (2018). The Saudi Intervention in Yemen: Struggling for Status. Insight Turkey, 20(2), 125-142.
Doostmohammad, A., & Mousavi, A., & Amani Sari Beigloo, J. (2012). A Study of the Causes of Wars between the Government and the Shiites. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND AREA STUDIES, 19(1), 97-114.
Durac, V. (2015). The Role of Non-State Actors in Arab Countries after the Arab Uprisings. IEMed Mediterranean, 5 p.
European parliament. (2017). The financing of the ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Directorate-general for External Policies: Policy Department, 20 p.
Farrukh, M. (2017, November). Threat Update: Yemen and Southern Secessionism. Retrieved April 2022, from critical threats: https://www.criticalthreats.org/briefs/threat-update/ update- and-assessment-november-2-2017
Forster, R. (2017). The Southern Transitional Council: Implications for Yemen's peace process. Middle East Policy, 24(3), 133–144.
Gerges, F. (2016). ISIS: A History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goldsmith, L. T. (2011). Syria's Alawites and the Politics of Sectarian Insecurity: A Khaldunian Perspective* - Ortadoğu Etütleri. Ortadoğu Etütleri, 3(1), 33-60.
Grigorescu, A. (2008). East and Central European Countries and the Iraq War. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(1), 281-299.
Hadi, M. (2017, May). EXCLUSIVE: Yemen president says UAE acting like occupiers. Retrieved April 2022, from middle east eye: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/exclusive-yemen-president-says-uae-acting-occupiers.
Hokayem, E. (2012). The Gulf States and Syria. United States Institute of Peace.
Mirza, M. N., Abbas, H., & Qaisrani, I. (2021). Anatomising Syrian crisis: Enumerating actors, motivations, and their strategies (2011-2019). School of Politics and International Relations, 4(1), 41-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/5.1.4
Noori, A. R., & Masoudi, H. (2022). Re-Focusing on Iran-Russia Cooperation in the Syrian Crisis; A ‘Broader’ Strategic Stability on Agenda. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(4), 156-185.
Pape, R. A. (2005). Soft Balancing against the United States. International Security, 30(1), 7–45. doi:10.1162/01622880548 94607
Pollack, K. M. (2020). The Evolution of the Revolution: The Changing Nature of Iran’s Axis of Resistance. American Enterprise Institute.
Schweller, R. (1998). Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schweller, R. L. (1996). Neorealism's status-quo bias: What security dilemma? Security Studies, 5(3), 90-121. doi:10.1080/09636419608429277
Schweller, R. L. (2006). Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: University Press.
Seale, P. (1989). Asad, the Struggle for the Middle East. California: University of California Press.
Soltaninejad, M. (2018). Coalition-Building in Iran’s Foreign Policy: Understanding the ‘Axis of Resistance’. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 716-731.
Steinberg, G. (2021). The “Axis of Resistance”: Iran’s Expansion in the Middle East Is Hitting a Wall. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 38 p.
Sullivan, M. (2014). Hezbollah in Syria. Institute for the Study of War, 43 p.
Tan, K. H., & Perudin, A. (2019). The “Geopolitical” Factor in the Syrian Civil War: A Corpus-Based Thematic Analysis. Sage Articles, 9(2). doi:10.1177/2158244019856729.
Walt, S. (1987). The origins of alliances. New York: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (2008). Realism and International Politics. New York: Routledge.
Wight, M. (1978). Power Politics. New York: Holmes & Maier.