تعاملات دیپلماتیک

تعاملات دیپلماتیک

مقایسه تطبیقی دیپلماسی اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا و بریکس در مسیر همگرایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین الملل دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.
2 استاد روابط بین الملل دانشکده روابط بین الملل وزارت امور خارجه، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشیار روابط بین الملل دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.
چکیده
اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا و بریکس از نهادهای متاخر در جهت ایجادیک سازمان قوی و منسجم برای تامین منافع ملی، جمعی و تاثیرگذار بر اقتصاد و سیاست بین الملل تشکیل شده که در مسیر یکپارچگی عملکرد متفاوتی داشته­اند. اتحادیه، در مسیر همگرایی در امر نهادگرایی، تنظیم مقررات، قراردادهای تجارت ترجیحی و تجارت آزاد  که منجر به رشد تجاری در میان کشورهای عضو شده موفق بوده است. از طرف دیگر، بریکس نهادی مهم متشکل از کشورهای بزرگ در حال توسعه، سرمایه دار و تاثیر گذار بر اقتصاد جهانی است که در حال حاضر به مثابه یک ائتلاف بین الدولی با برنامه اقتصادی مشخص می­باشد و هنوز تا تبدیل شدن به یک سازمان اقتصادی فاصله دارد، ولی به لحاظ ماهوی و جغرافیایی می­توان آن را یک نهاد اقتصادی فرامنطقه­ای به حساب آورد که به دنبال ارتقاءمدل توسعه اقتصادی خاص خود می­باشد و در صدد است با افزایش همگرایی اقتصادی بین اعضاء، الگوی توسعه اقتصادی خود را تحکیم نماید. بریکس در مقایسه با اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا، هیچ یک از مراحل همگرایی اقتصادی را که شامل قرارداد تجارت ترجیحی، تجارت آزاد، ایجاد اتحادیه گمرکی، حذف تعرفه های تجاری و تعرفه­های مشترک تجارت خارجی است را خلق نکرده است و از طریق بیانیه­ها و یادداشت تفاهمات، مکانیسم همکاری را برای اعضاء ترسیم می­کند. هدف این تحقیق بررسی همگرایی در این دو نهاد است و می خواهد به این سوال پاسخ دهد که کدامیک از سازمانهای اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا و بریکس در زمینه همگرایی موفقیت بیشتری کسب کرده­اند؟ با استفاده از روش پژوهشی کیفی و رویکردمقایسه تطبیقی با بررسی آمار تجاری و اقتصادی و اقداماتی که هر دو نهاد از زمان شکل­گیری به انجام رسانده­اند، به این نتیجه می­رساند که اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا در تامین اهداف همگرایانه در امر تجارت موفق­تر عمل کرده اماقابلیت بریکس در همگرایی سیاسی و توسعه اقتصادی بیشتر بوده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Comparative Study of Diplomacy of the Eurasian Economic Union and BRICS Towards Integration

نویسندگان English

Somayeh Mokhtari 1
Mohammad Kazem Sajjadpour 2
Mahnaz Godarzi 3
1 PhD student, Department of International Relations, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of International Relations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده English

Problem Statement
After the establishment of the European Common Market, several economic integration processes emerged worldwide, including ASEAN, NAFTA, Mercosur, ECO, SAARC, the Southern African Development Council, and the Southern African Customs Union. Integration levels differ across regions, depending on political will, market openness, and trade concessions. Consequently, various types and stages of economic integration—preferential trade, free trade, common market, customs union, economic union, and political union—have formed globally. The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and BRICS are recent institutions aimed at fostering strong and coherent economic and political cooperation, enhancing national and collective interests, and influencing the global economy and international politics.
Objective
This dissertation employs a qualitative comparative approach to analyze the state of integration in the EAEU and BRICS, aiming to:
Increase understanding and knowledge of economic integration processes
Classify and evaluate institutional achievements
Identify possibilities for harmonization and unification of integrative measures
The central research question is: Which of the Eurasian Economic Union or BRICS has achieved greater success in the field of integration?
The research hypothesis posits that the EAEU has been more successful in trade integration, whereas BRICS has achieved greater political and economic influence.
Methodology
A qualitative comparative study was conducted to examine the integration strategies and outcomes of both organizations, considering their structural, political, and economic differences.
Findings / Results
Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)
The EAEU has focused on economic coherence from the outset, promoting integration in agriculture, energy, industry, banking, and pharmaceuticals. Its achievements include institutionalization, regulatory development, trade growth, reduction/elimination of tariffs, preferential agreements, free trade agreements, and customs unions with third countries. Success largely depends on member states’ political will and capacities.
BRICS
BRICS has successfully influenced global economic growth and trade despite lacking formal economic integration mechanisms such as preferential trade agreements or a common market. It operates as an intergovernmental coalition of influential developing countries and emerging markets, facilitating global trade expansion. BRICS relies on statements and memoranda of understanding rather than binding institutional regulations, yet it has a significant impact on international trade and the economies of developing countries.
Conclusion
Both EAEU and BRICS have created trade among their members and promoted economic development, albeit through different mechanisms. EAEU demonstrates deeper integration through institutionalized economic cooperation, whereas BRICS leverages political influence and flexible intergovernmental collaboration. This supports the research hypothesis: while differing in nature and structure, both institutions have enhanced economic integration and promoted state-driven development models, with EAEU emphasizing formal integration and BRICS offering easier membership and influence.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

BRICS
Common Market
Eurasian Economic Union
Free Trade
Integration
Trade
Anand, P.B; Fennell Shailaj; Comim Flavio (2021): Handbook of BRICS and Emerging Economies, ISBN: 9780198827535, Oxford University Press, Oxford
 
Brown, Emily (2021). "BRICS and the Evolution of Global Trade". International Trade Review, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 67-89.
Busygina, Irina (2024), Impact of the war in Ukraine on Eurasian Economic Union, Available: https://www.ponarseurasia.org/the-impact-of-the-war-in-ukraine-on-the-eurasian-economic-union/
Kinyakin, A. (2016), “The Eurasian Economic Union: Between Co-Existence, Confrontation and Cooperation with the EU”, Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej10(3): 461-480, Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322645416_The_Eurasian_Economic_Union_between_coexistence_confrontation_and_cooperation_with_the_EU
 
Lindberg, Leon 1963. The Political Dynamics of European Integration. Stanford, CA: Princeton University Press.
Lindberg, Leon and Scheingold, Stuart 1970. Europe’s Would-Be Polity. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall
Luzina and colleagues (2018). “The International and Legal Framework for Transregionalization of Trade and Economic Cooperation of the BRICS Countries” European Research Studies Journal Volume XXI, Special Issue 3,176-166, Available: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/40310/1/The%20International%20and%20Legal%20Framework%20for%20Transregionalization%20of%20Trade%20and%20Economic%20Cooperation%20of%20the%20BRICS%20Countries.pdf
Malle, S. (2016), “Economic Sovereignty. An Agenda for Militant Mitrany, David (1966), A Working Peace System, Chicago, Quadrangle Books.
 
Mostafa, G., Mahmood, M. 2018 “Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, challenges and possible future direction” journal of Eurasian Studies, pp. 163-17

Saadat M. AssanseitovaErlan K. AbilSaida A. Makhatova (2022):EAEU and BRICS: State and Prospects of Cooperation – EconPapers, A chapter in Current Problems of the World Economy and International Trade, 2022, vol. 42, pp 161-173 from Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISBN: 978-1-80262-090-0, Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0190-128120220000042016/full/html?skipTracking=true

 
Salzman, Rachel S. (2019): Russia, BRICS, and the Disruption of Global Order,  University Press, 175 pages, ISBN: 9781626166615, Georgetown
 
Sarkar, A.N (2016): BRICS New Development Bank: A Game-changer for the Emerging Economies, Avon Publication
Smith, John (2022). "The Role of BRICS in the Global Economy". Journal of International Economics, Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 123-145.
ISBN
9381839735, 9789381839737
 
 
Vinokurov, Evgeny, 2018, Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union, Palgrave Macmilan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92825-8

 

UNCTAD (2023): BRICS Investment Report 2023, UNCTAD, Geneva, available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diae2023d1_en.pdf

 

UNCTAD (2023): Evolution of the world's 25 top trading nations, available at: https://unctad.org/topic/trade-analysis/chart-10-may-2021

 

UNCTAD (2020):  World Investment Report 2020: International Production Beyond the Pandemic. United Nations: New York and Geneva. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2020_en.pdf
  
Wang, Chen (2017). "BRICS and Regional Economic Integration: A Comparative Analysis". Journal of Economic Integration, Vol. 19, Issue 3, pp. 109-128.

 Yang Xun, Bai Yang (2022) : World Economic Outlook Update, July 2022. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2022/07/26/world-economic-outlook-update-july-2022 8
Cattane, N & B iziwick, M (2014). “The BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement and its Position in the Emerging Global Financial Architecture” Polcy Insights 10, Available: https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Policy-Insights-10.pdf
 
 
 
https://eec.eaeunion.org/en/comission/collegium-members/
Domestic Markets Operation in the territory of the Eurasian Economic Union (eaeunion.org)