تعاملات دیپلماتیک

تعاملات دیپلماتیک

متغیرهای تاثیرگذار بر ساختار قدرت در خاورمیانه و جایگاه آینده دیپلماسی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
استادیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل دانشکده حقوق و علوم‌سیاسی دانشگاه بین‌المللی اهل بیت، تهران، ایران.
10.22034/dpiq.2026.580546.1085
چکیده
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با این پرسش محوری که متغیرهای کلیدی چگونه ساختار قدرت در خاورمیانه را بازآرایی می‌کنند و این بازآرایی از چه طریق بر جایگاه آینده دیپلماسی ایران اثر می‌گذارد؟ به تحلیل عوامل تعیین‌کننده در شکل‌گیری نظم امنیتی منطقه پرداخته است. روش پژوهش پیش رو کیفی و با رویکرد تحلیلی کیفی محتوا در چارچوب نظریه مجموعه‌های امنیتی منطقه‌ای است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد در سطح کلان، دو روند کاهش تمرکز ایالات متحده بر خاورمیانه و نفوذ فزاینده اقتصادی و فناورانه چین، ساختار قدرت منطقه‌ای را دگرگون می‌سازد. در سطح منطقه‌ای نیز شش متغیر کلیدی بیشترین نقش را در شکل‌دهی به آرایش امنیتی آینده دارند که شامل تنش ایران و رژیم صهیونیستی، توان هسته‌ای و موشکی ایران، روابط ایران و عربستان سعودی، تداوم روند صلح ابراهیم، نفوذ چین در زیرساخت‌های فناوری و تغییر اولویت‌های سیاست خارجی آمریکا می‌شوند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد خاورمیانه وارد دوره‌ای طولانی از گذار پرتنش شده که در آن اقتصاد و فناوری به کانون اصلی امنیت و رقابت قدرت تبدیل می‌شوند. در این شرایط، جایگاه آینده دیپلماسی ایران صرفاً به دارایی‌های سخت‌افزاری مانند بازدارندگی موشکی و نفوذ منطقه‌ای وابسته نیست، بلکه به توانایی ایجاد ثبات اقتصادی، تنوع‌بخشی به اقتصاد درون‌زا، جذب فناوری‌های راهبردی، کاهش تنش با عربستان از طریق دیپلماسی فعال و ارتقای ظرفیت ائتلاف‌سازی منطقه‌ای که ارتباط مستقیمی به قدرت دیپلماتیک نیز دارند؛ وابسته است. در نظم امنیتی نوظهور، کارآمدی اقتصادی و توان تولید رفاه به منابع مهم مشروعیت داخلی و نفوذ خارجی تبدیل می‌شوند و ابزارهای سخت‌افزاری به تنهایی برای تثبیت جایگاه دیپلماتیک کافی نخواهند بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Variables Influencing the Power Structure in the Middle East and the Future Position of Iranian Diplomacy

نویسنده English

Sajad Mohseni
Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Ahlul Bayt International University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction
Global geopolitical transformations, particularly the gradual transition in the international distribution of power and the redefinition of the roles of extra-regional actors such as the United States and China, have placed the Middle East regional security complex on the verge of a structural transformation. This study seeks to analyze the determinants shaping the future regional security order and to explain the future position of Iranian diplomacy within the emerging regional power structure. The central concern of the research is to explain how key variables are reshaping the regional power structure and through what mechanisms these transformations affect the future position of Iranian diplomacy. The main hypothesis argues that although traditional factors such as military capabilities remain important, variables including economic resilience, access to strategic technologies, and the ability to adapt to emerging structural transformations will play an increasingly decisive role in shaping diplomatic influence and regional standing.
Research Question
How do the key variables reshape the power structure in the Middle East, and through what mechanisms do these transformations affect the future position of Iranian diplomacy?
Literature Review
The existing literature falls primarily into three categories: (a) macro-level approaches to power transition (e.g., Tammen & Kugler) that often overlook the agency of regional actors; (b) regional security complex theory (Buzan & Wæver), which provides a valuable analytical framework but does not sufficiently explain the distinctive characteristics and strategic behavior of individual political units; and (c) event-driven analyses (e.g., Danahar) that lack the theoretical depth required to explain the mechanisms underlying regional transformation. The present study seeks to bridge this gap through an integrated multi-level approach that combines structural and regional variables within a single analytical framework.
Methodology
The study adopts a qualitative methodology based on analytical qualitative content analysis within the framework of Regional Security Complex Theory. In this framework, the Middle East is examined as a regional security complex whose structure has historically been influenced by external ordering powers and is currently undergoing significant transformation as a result of shifting global and regional balances. Accordingly, the study analyzes a set of macro-level and regional-level variables to identify the principal drivers shaping the future regional power structure and their implications for Iranian diplomacy.
Findings
The findings indicate that at the macro level, two major trends are transforming the regional power structure: the gradual reduction of United States strategic concentration on the Middle East and the growing economic and technological influence of China. Within this broader structural context, recent American policies toward Iran can also be understood as part of a larger strategic effort to reallocate resources and attention toward competition with China.
At the regional level, six key variables are identified as the principal determinants of the future security environment: tensions between Iran and the Israeli regime; Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities; the trajectory of Iran–Saudi Arabia relations; the continuation of the Abraham Accords and their impact on regional alignments; China's growing influence in technological and infrastructural domains; and changing priorities in United States foreign policy. The findings demonstrate that the Middle East is entering a prolonged period of turbulent transition in which economy and technology increasingly become central components of security and power competition, thereby reshaping regional patterns of rivalry and cooperation.
Conclusion
The study concludes that the future position of Iranian diplomacy within the emerging regional order depends largely on Iran’s ability to manage the aforementioned variables. While strategic assets such as missile deterrence and regional influence remain important, they are insufficient on their own to secure a favorable diplomatic position. More decisive factors include the ability to establish economic stability, diversify the domestic economy, attract and develop strategic technologies, pursue active diplomacy aimed at reducing tensions—particularly with Saudi Arabia—and strengthen regional coalition-building capacities. These factors are directly linked to the effectiveness and influence of Iranian diplomacy in the evolving regional environment. In the emerging security order, economic efficiency and the capacity to generate welfare are becoming increasingly important sources of domestic legitimacy and external influence, while hard-power instruments alone are no longer sufficient to sustain diplomatic standing or regional influence.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Power Structure
Islamic Republic of Iran
Regional Security Complex
Intervening Actors
Diplomacy
- حافظ­نیا، محمدرضا، رومینا، ابراهیم (1396). «تأثیر علایق ژئوپلیتیکی ایران و عربستان سعودی در ایجاد چالش‌های منطقه‌ای در جنوب آسیا»، تحقیقات جغرافیایی، سال 32، شماره 2.
- حیدری، سامان، حکیم، حمید (1402). فرصت‌ها و چالش‌های جمهوری اسلامی ایران در جهان آینده و روندهای امنیتی آن تا سال 2025، تعاملات دیپلماتیک، دوره 1، شماره2.
- زاهدی، نسا، درشتی، حنانه (1404). دلایل دیپلماسی میانجی‌گرایانه چین پیرامون بحران غزه و عملیات هفتم اکتبر2023، تعاملات دیپلماتیک، دوره 3، شماره9.
- عباس­زاده فتح‌آبادی، مهدی، خسروی، محمدجواد (1404). آینده‌پژوهی نظم امنیتی منطقه غرب آسیا در فضای دیپلماسی پس از پیمان ابراهیم بر اساس روش پیتر شوارتز، تعاملات دیپلماتیک، دوره 3، شماره10.
References
- Altoraifi, A.(2012). The rise and demise of Saudi–Iranian rapprochement (1997–2009), PhD Dissertation, London School of Economics.
- Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: the structure of international security. https://ir101.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Buzan-Waever-2003-Regions-and-Powers-The-Structure-of-International-Security.pdf.
- Buzan, Barry & Wæver, Ole. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press.
- Chin, Warren (2019), Technology, war and the state: past, present and future, International Affairs 95: 4.
- Cordesman, Anthony H (2020), the Middle East: Losing Iraq and the Gulf, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Retrieved from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/americas-failed-strategy-middle-east-losing-iraq-and-gulf.
- Danahar, P. (2015). The New Middle East: The World After the Arab Spring. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Einhorn, Robert, Van Dipen, Vann (2019), Constraining Iran’s Missile Capabilities, Security, Strategy and Order, Brookings, Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/FP_20190321_missile_program_WEB.pdf.
- Faeq Merie, Muthanna and Others (2019), The rapprochement between China and the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: challenges and opportunities, Review of Central and East European Law, Vol 12, No 13.
- Farihat, Ibrahim(2020), De-securitisation and Pragmatism in the Persian Gulf: The Future of Saudi-Iranian Relations, Edinburgh University Press.
- Gause, F. G. III. (2014). Beyond sectarianism: The new Middle East cold war. Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper, 11, 1–27.
- Gause, F. G III. (2022). The Future of U.S.-Saudi Relations and the Regional Order. Brookings Institution.
- Gause, Gregory (2019), Should We Stay or Should We Go? The United States and the Middle East, Survival Global Politics and Strategy, 61:5.
- Griffith Asia Institute. (2025). China Belt and Road Initiative Investment Report 2024. Griffith University.
- Huang, Xiaoning (2016), The Iranian Nuclear Issue and Regional Security: Dilemmas, Responses and the Future, Sabbatical Leave Report, Department of Political Affairs, Middle East and West Asia Division.
- Katzman, K. (2019). Iran: Internal politics and U.S. policy and options, Congressional Research Service, RL32048. VERSION 346.
- Lynch, Marc. (2021). The New Arab Wars: Anarchy and Uprising in the Middle East. PublicAffairs.
- Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics (1st ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
- Michael, Kobi (2020), Israel-UAE Normalization of Relations: At the Expense of the Palestinians? Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343818476_Israel-UAE_Normalization_of_Relations_At_the_Expense_of_the_Palestinians.
- Mohammed-Bashar, F. (2020). Integrated Threat Management: an alternative approach to regional security system for ECOWAS [Thesis]. Walden University.
- Nadeem Mirza, Muhammad, Abbas, Hussain and Irfan Hasnain Qaisrani (2021), Structural Sources of Saudi–Iran Rivalry and Competition for the Sphere of Influence, Sage Publication, Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21582440211032642.
- Pakdel, M.(2025). The Desirable Threat: An Analysis of the Evolution of Iran’s Securitized Image, Arab Center for Research & Policy Studies, Retrived from: https://www.dohainstitute.org/en/Lists/ACRPS-PDFDocumentLibrary/the-desirable-threat-an-analysis-of-the-evolution-of-iran-securitized-image.pdf.
- Qian, Xuming, Fulton, Jonathan (2017), China-Gulf Economic Relationship under the “Belt and Road” Initiative, Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 11:3.
- Sohail, Shahwana.(2025, February 26). Supercharging the Abraham Accords?, Modern Diplomacy, Retrived from https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/02/26/trump-2-0-supercharging-the-abraham-accords/.
- Stewart, Lan J and Others (2020), The Status of the Front End of Saudi Arabia’s Nuclear Cycle, Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, Retrieved from: https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nonpro-Note-status-of-front-end-Saudi-Arbia-nuclear-fuel-cycle.pdf.
- Stivachtis, Y. A. (Ed.). (2018). Conflict and diplomacy in the Middle East: External actors and regional rivalries. E-International Relations.
- Tammen, R. L., & Kugler, J. (2023). Power transition in the 21st century: The geopolitical consequences of China's rise. International Security, 48(2), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00455.
- Tang, S. (2004). A systemic theory of the security environment. Journal of Strategic Studies, 27(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140239042000232756.
- The White House. (2018). Remarks by President Trump on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
- The White House. (2025, March). National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The White House, available at: www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf.
- Wehrey, F., Kaye, D. D., Watkins, J., Martini, J., & Guffey, R. A. (2009). Saudi-Iranian relations since the fall of Saddam: Rivalry, cooperation, and implications for U.S. policy. RAND Corporation.
Albarasneh Ayman Saleh & Dania Koleilat Khatib (2019). The US policy of containing Iran – from Obama to Trump 2009–2018, Global Affairs, 5:4-5, 369-387, DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2019.1701951.
 
Translated References into English
Abbaszadeh Fathabadi, M., & Khosravi, M. (2025). Future studies of the regional security order in West Asia in the diplomatic context after the Abraham Accords: A study based on Peter Schwartz's method. Diplomatic Interactions, 3(10), 117–176, [In Persian].
- Heidari, S., & Hakim, H. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the future world and its security trends until 2025. Diplomatic Interactions, 1(2), 129–168, [In Persian].
- Reza Hafeznia M, Roumina E.(2017) The Impact of Geopolitical Interests of Iran and Saudi Arabia on Regional Challenges in Southwest Asia. GeoRes, 32 (2) :9-20, [In Persian].
- Zahedi, N., & Darashti, H. (2025). Explaining China’s mediation diplomacy in the context of the Gaza crisis and the October 7, 2023 events. Diplomatic Interactions, 3(9), 33–62, [In Persian].