نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Introduction
The geographical environment and strategic location have historically served as a foundation for shaping opportunities, challenges, and competition among powers. This geographical setting not only holds natural and spatial value but also exerts influence in international politics. In this context, transit corridors, as networks of communication, energy flows, and vital arteries of the global economy, have gained significance beyond mere trade routes, becoming instruments of influence, geopolitical competition, and power balancing in specific regions. Iran, located in West Asia, due to its unique position as a crossroads connecting three continents and as a central hub of the world’s energy resources, has consistently been a stage for intense competition among regional and extra-regional actors. In recent years, amid rapid transformations in the global order and efforts by emerging powers to enhance their geopolitical influence, large-scale transit projects such as the “Persian Gulf–Mediterranean Transit Corridor” have gained prominence. This corridor, connecting the Persian Gulf to the eastern Mediterranean through Iran, Iraq, and Syria, is not merely a transport route; it also serves as a tool for redefining power relations, reorganizing energy and trade flows, and reconstructing the regional order. The Islamic Republic of Iran, due to its unique geostrategic position, has historically enjoyed transit advantages and has considered the north–south and east–west routes as core pillars of its strategic depth and geo-economic development.
Importance of the Study
The Persian Gulf–Mediterranean corridor, alongside offering opportunities to enhance Iran’s regional role, could—if Tehran remains inactive—lead to the emergence of rival or parallel routes, thereby posing challenges to national interests, relations with neighbors, Iran’s position in global supply chains, and its geopolitical influence.
Research Question
The main question of this study is: How does the aforementioned transit initiative and corridor function as a form of diplomacy, leading to a reorganization of power structures and geopolitical competition for Iran in West Asia? What opportunities and threats does it present for the foreign policy and regional strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran?
Conceptual Framework: Geopolitics, Geostrategy, and Patterns of Power Relations
Geopolitics examines the impact of geographical factors on policies and power relations among international actors, analyzing inter-state relations through patterns such as interactive, dominant, influential, competitive, and confrontational. Geostrategy involves the design and guidance of strategies based on the geographical environment, particularly in military domains, taking into account both static and dynamic variables. The concept of “cooperative competition” and the management of conflicting interests demonstrate that actors, despite divergent interests, can achieve common goals through collaboration, partnership, and co-creation.
Literature Review
Genz, Sinkkonen, and Vogt (2023): Connectivity diplomacy refers to a set of policies through which states design and govern connectivity rules and pathways, inherently competitive in nature.
Karbalija (2016) and Kontsi (2018): Transport, energy, and digital infrastructures have become geo-economic tools, generating “power through connectivity.”
Winter (2020): Connectivity projects carry identity- and order-building narratives, highlighting the normative and civilizational dimensions of connection.
Calibasano (2024) and Fulton (2021): Competition among corridors supported by major powers leads to “transit wars,” where control over routes replaces territorial control.
Hafzenia and Ghorbani (2020): The geo-economics of corridors in West Asia is closely intertwined with security and geopolitical calculations.
Motaghi et al. (2019) and Mohammadpour et al. (2022): Technical-economic studies focus on cost reduction, transport time, and infrastructure capacity.
Dehshiri and Rahimi (2021) and Sajadpour (2019): Geopolitical-security studies analyze corridors within the framework of resistance-axis competition and the containment of Iran.
Research Gap
Previous findings indicate that the existing literature either focuses on the economic aspects of corridors or their geopolitical dimensions, with limited attention to intermediate mechanisms and the integration of both dimensions.
Research Methodology
This study adopts a qualitative approach with a descriptive–interpretive method, focusing on the Persian Gulf–Mediterranean corridor and examining its geopolitical and geo-economic roles in reorganizing the balance of power in West Asia. The data include official documents, think tank reports, and academic articles (2015–2025), which were coded and analyzed using directed thematic analysis across three dimensions: geo-economic, geopolitical, and diplomatic. The validity of the analysis was ensured through the triangulation of sources and the incorporation of contrasting viewpoints, although access to elite interviews was limited.
Research Findings
1. Geopolitical Outcomes
Iran emerges as a connectivity hub: Iran’s geography and domestic infrastructure, particularly Imam Khomeini Port and Persian Gulf ports, position the country as a key node connecting international routes and major trade arteries of Russia, China, and India. Deepening alliances with Eurasian powers: The corridor aligns Iran’s interests with Russia (bypassing NATO pressure and sanctions) and China (reducing dependence on the Malacca Strait and expanding economic influence). Countering U.S. containment: Anti-sanctions supply chains reduce economic pressure on Iran and contribute to the formation of a geo-economic bloc resistant to the West.
Geo-economic Outcomes
Development of the maritime economy and port capacities: The expansion of Imam Khomeini Port and Persian Gulf ports transforms Iran from a transit route into a production and export hub, reducing costs and generating added economic value. Synergy with Russian and Chinese projects: Integration with initiatives such as China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the North–South Corridor strengthens Iran’s transit revenues and economic security. Role in the emerging geo-economic order: Iran’s strategic position connecting Eurasia to the Indian Ocean establishes it as a central logistical and economic hub, mitigating the impact of dollar-denominated sanctions.
Opportunities and Threats Along the Corridor
Iraq: The Port of Faw and road development can transform Iraq into a transit hub; however, regional competition and parallel Kuwaiti projects impose constraints.
Lebanon: Revitalizing Tripoli Port could turn Lebanon into a logistics hub; however, domestic instability, sanctions, and competition with Arab-Israeli routes remain major obstacles.
Syria: Post-Assad developments, including the adoption of more neutral policies and the attraction of Arab and Chinese investments, may challenge the Iran-centered corridor and intensify competition among regional actors (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, China).
Actor Competition and Convergence
Iran plays a central and leading role, aiming to enhance geo-economic resilience and secure access to the Mediterranean.
Iraq and Syria play decisive but high-risk roles, while Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Israel primarily act as competitors.
Russia and China have the capacity to strengthen the corridor if stability is maintained, while the United States, through sanctions and support for rival routes, contributes to competition and uncertainty.
Theoretical Analysis and Geopolitical Patterns
The corridor reflects the geographical manifestation of the policies of Iran, Russia, and China and serves as a tool for reorganizing regional and global order. It fosters economic and strategic convergence among corridor countries while intensifying competition and confrontation with the United States and its allies. The Persian Gulf–Mediterranean corridor represents a multi-layered strategy, encompassing both geopolitical (power and influence) and geo-economic (trade and development) dimensions, elevating Iran from a pressured state to a central and influential actor in Eurasia. The Persian Gulf–Mediterranean corridor transforms Iran from a sanctioned, peripheral country into a central geostrategic and geo-economic hub in Eurasia, simultaneously enhancing economic opportunities, strengthening alliances with major powers, and intensifying regional and global competition.
کلیدواژهها English
فارسی
· اندیشکده زاویه. (1404). کریدور شمال-جنوب؛ از پروژه زیرساختی تا ابزار سیاست جهانی. قابل دسترسی 20/۱۲/1403: https://zaviyeinsight.com/2025/10/18/north-south-corridor-of-the-infrastructure-project/
· دنیای اقتصاد. (1403). ایران؛ شاهراه حیاتی کریدور شمال-جنوب. قابل دسترسی 12/5/1404: https://donya-e-eqtesad.com/fa/tiny/news-4145950
· دهشیری، محمدرضا و رحیمی، مصطفی. (۱۴۰۰). تحلیل ژئوپلیتیکی کریدور مقاومت: پیامدها و راهبردها. مطالعات راهبردی، سال بیستوچهارم، شماره ویژه.
· دوگین، الکساندر. (۱۳۹۴) مبانی ژئوپلیتیک: آینده ژئوپلیتیک روسیه. ترجمه: احسان موحدیان. تهران: آکادمی مطالعات ایرانی لندن.
· رزق، وسام. (۲۰۲۳). لبنان و جاده ابریشم: فرصتی تاریخی یا رؤیایی از دست رفته؟. النهار (An-Nahar).
· رنجبر حیدری، وحید. (1403) دیپلماسی اقتصادی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در رقابت با کریدورهای تجاری بینالمللی. فصلنامه تعاملات دیپلماتیک، سال دوم، شماره ۵، ۱–۵۲.
· شریفزاده، زهرا، میرکوشش، امیرهوشنگ. (1402) نظامیشدن خلیج فارس و تأثیر آن بر سیاست خارجی ایران در سال ۲۰۱۹. فصلنامه تعاملات دیپلماتیک، سال اول، شماره ۱، ۱۳۱–۱۴۹.
· شعار، کرم. (2024).چالش بازسازی سوریه: تقدم حکمرانی اقتصادی بر سیاست. مرکز خاورمیانه مدرسه اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی لندن (LSE).
· عزتی، عزتالله (۱۳۹۶) ژئواستراتژی و قرن بیست و یکم. تهران: نشر سمت.
· عزتی، عزتالله (۱۳۹7) ژئوپلیتیک. تهران: نشر سمت.
· العمری، فراس. (2023). بنادر سوریه: ریه اقتصادی که پس از جنگ در انتظار سرمایهگذاری است. تلویزیون سوریه.
· فتحی، محمدجواد، عبدخدایی، مجتبی و شیراوند، صارم. ( 1397)، پیوند کد و ژنگان ژئوپلیتیک در سیاست خارجی: مطالعه موردی جمهوری اسلامی ایران و عربستان سعودی، پژوهش های راهبردی سیاست. (7) 24-15۶.
· کریمیپور، یدالله (۱۳۹۴) ژئوپلیتیک پیشرفته. تهران: نشر دانشگاهی.
· متقی، ابراهیم و همکاران. (۱۳۹۸). نقش کریدورهای ترانزیتی در توسعه اقتصادی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. تحقیقات جغرافیایی، دوره جدید، شماره ویژه.
· مجتهدزاده، پیروز. (۱۳۹۱). جغرافیای سیاسی و ژئوپلیتیک. تهران: نشر قومس.
· مجتهدزاده، پیروز. (۱۳۹۶). ایدههای ژئوپلیتیکی و واقعیتهای ایرانی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
· محمدپور، علی؛ رفیع، حسین؛ و مرادی، جهانگیر. (۱۴۰۱). توسعه محور ترانزیتی خلیج فارس-مدیترانه و پیامدهای امنیتی-اقتصادی آن در مناسبات ژئوپلیتیکی منطقهای و جهانی. اقتصاد دفاع و توسعه پایدار، دوره ۷، شماره ۲۶، صص ۱۲۳-۱۴۶.
· مرکز حرمون للدراسات المعاصرة. (2023). سوریه در ترازوی قدرتهای منطقهای: سناریوهای پسا-توافق.
· المشارق. (2021). جاده تاپلاین عربستان سعودی: یک راه حیاتی در زمان جنگ و صلح. قابل دسترسی ۲۶/۱۲/1402:https://almashareq.com/en_GB/articles/cnmi_am/features/2021/06/29/feature-02
· ملاح، عصمت. (۲۰۲۲). بندر طرابلس در قلب درگیری ژئوپلیتیک: آیا بر رقابت اسرائیل غلبه خواهد کرد؟. الأخبار.
References
· Abbasov, N., & Souleimanov, E. A. (2025). After Assad: How Russia is losing the Middle East. Middle East Policy, 32(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.70005
· Al-Mashareq. (2021). Saudi Arabia’s Tapline road: A vital route in war and peace. https://almashareq.com/en_GB/articles/cnmi_am/features/2021/06/29/feature-02
· Anderson JR, (2014). Irvine H. Aramco, the United States, and Saudi Arabia: A study of the dynamics of foreign oil policy, 1933-1950. Princeton University Press, 2014. p. 202. 7
· Bourque, S, A. (2002). Jayhawk: The VII Corps in the Persian Gulf War. Department of the Army, 2002, p. 78.
· Colibasanu, A. (2024). Trade corridor wars: Escalating competition between China, Russia, Iran and the West. Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI). Retrieved from FPRI website:
https://www.fpri.org/article/2024/12/trade-corridor-wars-china-russia-iran-west/
· Contessi, N. P. (2018). Foreign policy diversification and intercontinental transport corridors: Explaining Kazakhstan’s trans-Eurasian pivot. Europe–Asia Studies, 70(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1423946
· Fulton, J. (2021). China's balancing act in the Gulf's infrastructure competition. The Atlantic Council. Retrieved from https://www. atlanticcouncil. org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/chinas-balancing-act-in-the-gulfs-infrastructure-competition/
· Gaens, B., Sinkkonen, V., & Vogt, H. (2023). Connectivity and order: The evolution of global and regional connectivity politics. East Asia, 40(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-023-09383-7
· Ghosn, R. (2011). Territorialities of a Transnational Oil Flow, CIST2011-Fonder les sciences du territoire. 2011, p. 167.
· Hafeznia, M. R. , & Ghorbani, A. (2020). The Geoeconomics of the Middle East: Competition and Opportunities for Iran. Geopolitics Quarterly, 16(57), 22-45.
· Hancock, J. (2021). The Eastern Trade Network of Ancient Rome, Word History. 2 June 2021. Available at: https://www. worldhistory. org/article/1761/the-eastern-trade-network-of-ancientrome/#google_vignette [accessed: 26/12/2023].
· Ismaeel, Q. , & Gebeily, M. (2023). Iraq's $17bn Development Road seeks to reshape Mideast trade. Reuters. Retrieved September 27 from https://www. reuters. com/world/middle-east/iraqs-17bn-development-road-seeks-reshape-mideast-trade-2023-09-27/
· Jafari, S. (2021). The geoeconomic implications of the Persian Gulf-Mediterranean corridor for regional integration. Journal of Strategic Studies, 24(3), 45-68.
· Kaufman, A. (2014). Between Permeable and Sealed Borders, Intelligence Journal Middle East Studies, n. o 46. 2014, pp. 105-110.
· Khatib, Line (2023). The Politics of Syria: Post-Assad Changes and Regional Shifts. London: Routledge.
· Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Vision 2030: An overview. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/media/cofh1nmf/vision2030-overview.pdf
· Kurbalija, J. (2016). Connectivity: Facts and perspectives. Asia–Europe Foundation (ASEF) Outlook Report. Singapore: ASEF.
· Levin, B. (2023). Jared Kushner Could Be Made Secretary of State in Second Trump Term, and No, That's Not a Joke, Vanity Fair. 7 December 2023. Available at: https://www. vanityfair. com/news/2023/12/jared-kushner-donald-trump-secretary-of-state [accessed: 28/12/2023]
· Little, D. (1990). Pipeline politics: America, TAPLINE, and the Arabs, Business History Review, vol. 64, n. o 2. 1990, p. 257
· Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421-437.
· Mahan, A. T. (1890). The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783. Little, Brown and Company.
· Mileski, T. (2015). Eurasianism – A new Russian geopolitical doctrine. Croatian International Relations Review, 21(74), 47-84
· Mohemmi, Y. (2024) Lebanon's Transit Role: Hostage to Syrian Instability and International Sanctions. Carnegie Middle East Center. Retrieved from https://carnegie-mec. org/2024/01/15/lebanon-s-transit-role-hostage-to-syrian-instability-and-international-sanctions-pub-91404
· Pour-Ahmad, A. , & Mousavi, M. N. (2019). Geopolitics of transit corridors in West Asia. Tehran University Press.
· Raimondi, E. J. (2019). America's Forgotten Project: TAPline and the Rise of a New Capitalist Order in the Levant, 1945-1950. Bard College, Spring 2019, pp. 16-17.
· Ritter, W. (1999). A fast transport network for the Near East? Promet – Traffic & Transportation, 11(2–3), 131–136.
· Ritter, Wigand. (1999) A Transrapid-Network for the Near East?, Promet-Traffic&Transportation, vol. 11, n. o 2-3. 1999, p. 132.
· Sadjadpour, K. (2019). Iran's Long Game in the Middle East. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment. org/2019/10/29/iran-s-long-game-in-middle-east-pub-80186
· Sevin, E. (2015). Pathways of connection: An analytical approach to the impacts of public diplomacy. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.012
· Shine, J. W. (1953). Aramaco And Tapline In International Oil. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1953. p. 66
· Strategic Council on Foreign Relations. (2023, April 15). Technical and political dimensions of the Shalamcheh–Basra railway project. https://www.scfr.ir/en/technical-and-political-dimensions-of-the-shalamcheh-basra-railway-project/
· The Cradle. (2022). The Faw Port: Iraq’s new trade gateway. Retrieved June 22 from https://thecradle. co/articles/the-faw-port-iraqs-new-trade-gateway
· The Korea Herald. (2020). Daewoo E&C signs $2. 625B contract to build the first phase of Iraq's Al-Faw Port. Retrieved December 30 from https://www. koreaherald. com/view. php?ud=20201230000830
· Winter, T. (2020). Silk Road diplomacy: Geopolitics and histories of connectivity. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(3), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1550197
· World History Encyclopedia. (2020). Map of Roman-Parthian trade routes [Illustration]. October 27: https://www.worldhistory.org/image/11763/map-of-roman--parthian-trade-routes/
Translated References into English
· Ali-Asghari, M. E. (2023). Strategies for securing the national interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Persian Gulf. Diplomatic Interactions Quarterly, 1(3), 143–181. [In Persian]
· Al-Mashareq. (2021). Saudi Arabia’s Tapline road: A vital route in war and peace. Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://almashareq.com/en_GB/articles/cnmi_am/features/2021/06/29/feature-02 [In Persian]
· Al-Omari, F. (2023). Syrian ports: The economic lung awaiting investment after the war. Syria TV. [In Persian]
· Dehshiri, M. R., & Rahimi, M. (2021). Geopolitical analysis of the Resistance Corridor: Implications and strategies. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 24(Special Issue). [In Persian]
· Donya-ye Eqtesad. (2024). Iran: The vital hub of the North–South Corridor. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://donya-e-eqtesad.com/fa/tiny/news-4145950 [In Persian]
· Dugin, A. (2015). Foundations of geopolitics: The geopolitical future of Russia (E. Movahhedian, Trans.). Tehran: London Academy of Iranian Studies. [In Persian]
· Ezzati, E. (2017). Geostrategy and the 21st Century. Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
· Ezzati, E. (2018). Geopolitics. Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
· Fathi, M. J., Abdokhodaei, M., & Shiravand, S. (2018). The linkage between code and geopolitical genes in foreign policy: A case study of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia. Strategic Policy Research, 7, 156–124. [In Persian]
· Hafeznia, M. R. , & Ghorbani, A. (2020). The Geoeconomics of the Middle East: Competition and Opportunities for Iran. Geopolitics Quarterly, 16(57), 22-45. [In Persian]
· Harmoon Center for Contemporary Studies. (2023). Syria on the balance of regional powers: Post-agreement scenarios. [In Persian]
· Mallah, I. (2022). Tripoli port at the heart of geopolitical conflict: Will it outcompete Israel? Al-Akhbar. [In Persian]
· Mohammadpour, A., Rafiei, H., & Moradi, J. (2022). Development of the Persian Gulf–Mediterranean transit axis and its security-economic implications in regional and global geopolitical relations. Defense Economics and Sustainable Development Quarterly, 7(26), 123–146. [In Persian]
· Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2012). Political geography and geopolitics. Tehran: Qoumes Publications. [In Persian]
· Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2017). Geopolitical ideas and Iranian realities. Tehran: SAMT Publications. [In Persian]
· Mottaghi, E., et al. (2019). The role of transit corridors in the economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Geographical Research Quarterly, New Series (Special Issue). [In Persian]
· North–South Corridor. (2025). From an infrastructure project to a global policy tool. Zaviyeh Think Tank. Retrieved March 10, 2025, from https://zaviyeinsight.com/2025/10/18/north-south-corridor-of-the-infrastructure-project/ [In Persian]
· Pour-Ahmad, A. , & Mousavi, M. N. (2019). Geopolitics of transit corridors in West Asia. Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
· Ranjbar Heydari, V. (2025). Economic diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in competition with international trade corridors. Diplomatic Interactions Quarterly, 2(5), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.22034/dpiq.2025.475772.1009 [In Persian]
· Razq, W. (2023). Lebanon and the Silk Road: A historic opportunity or a lost dream? An-Nahar. [In Persian]
· Sadjadpour, K. (2019). Iran's Long Game in the Middle East. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment. org/2019/10/29/iran-s-long-game-in-middle-east-pub-80186 [In Persian]
· Shaar, K. (2024). The challenge of Syria’s reconstruction: The primacy of economic governance over politics. Middle East Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). [In Persian]
· Sharifzadeh, Z., & Mirkoushesh, A. H. (2023). Militarization of the Persian Gulf and its impact on Iran’s foreign policy in 2019. Diplomatic Interactions Quarterly, 1(1), 131–149. [In Persian]
