تعاملات دیپلماتیک

تعاملات دیپلماتیک

دیپلماسی اقتصادی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در رقابت با کریدورهای تجاری بین‌المللی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
استادیار علوم سیاسی دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی (ره) قزوین، ایران
چکیده
تحولات بین‌المللی حاکی از شکل‌گیری نظم نوین جهانی در قالب ایجاد ائتلاف‌های اقتصادی است. دولت‌ها در راستای دیپلماسی اقتصادی به دنبال عضویت در ائتلاف‌ها و اتصال به کریدورهای بین­المللی انتقال کالا و انرژی هستند و از طرفی با اتصال به کریدورها به دنبال کسب قدرت و جایگاه ممتاز در آینده اقتصاد جهانی می­باشند که این جنگ اقتصادی آینده ابرقدرت‌هاست. سؤال اصلی این پژوهش این است که امکان شکل‌گیری جنگ کریدورها و ایجاد ائتلاف یا رقابت جدید بازیگران سیستم بین‌الملل در طراحی مسیرهای جدید ترانزیتی میسر است؟ و جایگاه ایران در کریدورهای مجاور چگونه خواهد بود؟ با بهره­گیری از روش توصیفی- تحلیلی، آخرین وضعیت کریدورهای بین­المللی به‌ویژه؛ کریدور شمال - جنوب، شرق - غرب، زنگزور، یک کمربند - یک جاده، تراسیکا، بصره - ترکیه، هند- عرب - مدیترانه، لاجورد و کریدورCPEC حکایت از بروز جنگ کریدورها داشته و علی­رغم موقعیت ژئواکونومیک جمهوری اسلامی ایران به عنوان پیوند دهنده کریدورهای تجاری چین، هند و روسیه که می­تواند نقش هارتلند کریدوری در منطقه ایفاء نماید، بنا بر دلایلی ازجمله؛ اعمال تحریم­های اقتصادی توسط امریکا و ایجاد مانع نسبت به نقش­آفرینی ایران در معادلات اقتصادی جهانی، شاهد بروز جنگ کریدورها بوده که هدف آن حذف کشورهای غیر همسو با ابرقدرت‌ها و دور زدن ایران از مسیر کریدورهای مهم انتقال کالا و انرژی منطقه هستیم. لذا مشارکت ایران در ائتلاف‌های منطقه‌ای همچون بریکس و شانگهای و تقویت دیپلماسی اقتصادی، می‌تواند به خنثی‌سازی اثرات این جنگ اقتصادی کمک نماید.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Iran’s Economic Diplomacy in Competition with International Trade Corridors

نویسنده English

Vahid Ranjbar Heydari
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
International developments indicate the formation of a new world order in the form of creating economic alliances. States follow the membership in alliances and connection to international corridors for the transfer of goods and energy in line with economic diplomacy, and on the other hand, by connecting to corridors, they are seeking to gain power and a privileged position in the future of the global economy, which is the future economic war of the superpowers. The North-South, East-West, Zangezur, One Belt-one Road, Trasica, Basra-Turkey, India-Arab-Mediterranean, Lapis Lazuli and CPEC corridors, etc., indicate the emergence of a war of corridors, and despite the geoeconomics position of the Islamic Republic of Iran as a link between the trade corridors of China, India, and Russia, which can play the role of a corridor heartland in the region. The present study aims to study the economic diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in connection with international corridors and to obtain a precise understanding of the position of the sea-based economy in the policy and economic and political governance system of Iran, and the possibility of utilizing the economic potential of the transit corridors of goods and energy adjacent to Iran is also one of the main objectives of this study.
Research Background
A review of domestic and foreign studies related to the research topic indicates that none of the studies in the field of corridors have addressed the position of the economic diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the competition of important international corridors, but indirectly, articles have been published that can be referred to the study; Political-Legal Evaluation of the Unilateral Economic Sanctions of the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran (Qaedi et al., 1400), which has examined the legal nature of the US sanctions system against Iran. Another study entitled; US Foreign Policy and New Sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran (Simber, 2010) has examined the factors that have been effective in the formation and continuation of sanctions on Iran in US foreign policy. The research; Strategies for Developing a Maritime Economy to Achieve the Goals of the Resistance Economy (Karbkandi article, 2010) has tried to present strategies for developing a maritime economy in two areas: the development of maritime trade and the development of maritime industries, considering the opportunities and threats of Iran, the experiences of selected countries, and the opinions of experts. Other articles can also be found such as; Analyzing Iran's geopolitical role in international corridors and presenting the Iranian model, Heartland Corridor of the World (Noor Ali, 2021), Evaluating Central Asia-Europe International Corridors and Examining Obstacles to the Expansion of Iranian Transit (Arab Amiri, 2009), Weakening Iran's Position in International Corridors (Moshfegh, 2021), Economic Diplomacy and Foreign Policy (Chatterjee, 2021), and India's Arab-Mediterranean Corridor: A Paradigm Shift in Strategic Connectivity to Europe (Michaël Tanchum, 2021) was mentioned.
Methodology
This research was developed with a descriptive-analytical approach and used documentary and library methods to collect data. An analytical model based on the status of international corridors in the region was designed to analyze the data.
Results
The most important international corridors active or under construction in the field of transit of goods and energy in the region are as follows:

Middle Skop Corridor (TSC)
Southern Skop Corridor (Southern branch of Trans-Asian Rail Corridor)
East-West Corridor (Silk Road)
China’s One Belt, One Road Corridor (BRI)
north-south Corridor
Europe-Asia Corridor
Altid Corridor
The Eastern Caspian Sea Rail Corridor
Ashgabat Agreement Corridor
Islamabad-Tehran-Istanbul Corridor (ITI)
KTAI-China Corridor
Chabahar Agreement Corridor
Persian Gulf-Black Sea Corridor
Zangezur Corridor
CPEC Corridor
India-Arab-Mediterranean Corridor IMEC
Corridor Lapis Lazuli
Basra-Turkey Corridor
Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan-Afghanistan Rail Corridor
NSR North Sea Corridor
Uzbekistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan Corridor
Caspian Sea-Black Sea Maritime Corridor

Iran borders the world's two main fossil cores, the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea, and connects both as the only land bridge (Fathollah Nejad, 2021: 12). The geoeconomic position of Iran allows energy pipelines to continue from these regions to the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman. In addition, Iran not only has the shortest, safest, and most economical route to export oil and gas from these regions, but also has features such as; Suitable energy transmission lines in the north-south and east-west directions, ninety years of experience in the oil and gas industry, oil and gas installations, port facilities, and suitable refineries that can be connected to the energy consumption market of the Eurasian region and European and Asian countries (Mojtahedzadeh, 2000: 11).
 
Map: Iran's Position in Important Corridors in the Region
 
Discussion
Transportation is one of the fundamental issues that, in the domestic economy, is the link between industries and consumers, and in the foreign trade sector, is the link between the domestic economy and the global economy (Ng & Wilmsmeier, 2012: 127). Transport corridors are divided into 4 categories: national trade corridor, bilateral trade corridor, multilateral trade corridor, and multimodal and reciprocal corridor (Arnold, 2018). On the other hand, transport is divided into four sectors from the perspective of the method of transporting goods or passengers: air, road, rail, and sea transport, the first three of which are relevant for all countries in the world, but sea transport requires the existence of a water border and waterways (Sletmo, 2001: 333). The ocean-based economy, which is called the blue economy in global terminology, is the sustainable use of water resources and areas, including oceans, seas, lakes, coasts, and islands, for economic growth, improving livelihoods, and creating jobs. According to global statistics, the value of the main assets of the water areas is estimated at more than 24 trillion dollars and currently, fisheries are used more than other fields, so aquaculture, supplying 58% of fish to global markets, is the fastest and most vital part of the exploitation of these areas.
Final Result
Despite being located at the world's transit crossroads, the Islamic Republic of Iran, for various reasons such as; The imposition of cruel sanctions by the United States and its allies, the lack of development of necessary infrastructure, especially in the field of ports and combined transportation, the lack of active economic diplomacy, the vague understanding of the high potential of the sea-based economy and the reliance on the land-based economy, are witnessing the gradual removal of the Islamic Republic of Iran from the international corridors for the transfer of goods and energy. Iran can only interact with other major economic countries when it defines itself within their economic puzzles and equations, but in the current situation, the designers of the corridors are seeking to replace the new route and bypass Iran, including the CPEC corridor, which China will bypass Iran by investing in the Gwadar port of Pakistan, as the main competitor of the Chabahar ocean port, to challenge India's maritime power in the region and bypass the Malacca port route on the New Silk Road or the One Belt, One Road doctrine, and Pakistan, with the support of China, is completing the alternative route of the North-South Corridor.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Iran
Transit
Economic diplomacy
Geoeconomy
Corridor war
  • منابع

    فارسی

    • آقاجری، محمدجواد و رستمی­فر، سیمین سادات(1391). پیمان سارک و تأثیر آن بر منطقه‌گرایی، مطالعات روابط بین­الملل. 5 (20)، 40-9.
    • ارغوانی پیرسلامی، فریبرز و پیرانخو، سحر(1396). جاده ابریشم نوین به­مثابه راهبرد سیاست خارجی چین: فرصت‌ها و تهدیدها برای ایران، روابط خارجی. 9 (3)، 24-7.
    • پوراحمدی، حسین(1388). دیپلماسی انرژی و منافع ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، دانش سیاسی. 5(2)، 40-5.
    • چترجی، چارلز(1401). دیپلماسی اقتصادی و سیاست­گذاری خارجی (امیرحسین عرب‌پور، رضا توکلی و پیمان حسنی، مترجمان). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه امام صادق(ع)
    • سیف، محمد سعید، اژدری، علی‌اصغر و شجاعی، سعید(1397). نقش و جایگاه صنایع دریایی در اقتصاد ایران (با نگاهی به احکام قانون برنامه ششم توسعه و راهکارهای اجرایی دستیابی به اهداف صنایع دریایی)، مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، دفتر مطالعات انرژی، صنعت و معدن (گروه صنعت)
    • سیمبر، رضا و غلام­نیا، هادی(1400). دیپلماسی اقتصادی جمهوری اسلامی ایران با اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا (مطالعه موردی همکاری­های تعرفه­ای)، آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز. (113).
    • سیمبر، رضا(1389). سیاست خارجی امریکا و تحریم­های جدید علیه ج.ا.ایران، دانش سیاسی. 12(6)، 138- 107.
    • طیب، علیرضا و بزرگی، وحید(1396). نظریه‌های متعارض در روابط بین‌الملل. تهران: نشر قومس.
    • فتحی، محمدجواد، عبدخدایی، مجتبی و شیراوند، صارم(1397). پیوند کد و ژنگان ژئوپلیتیک در سیاست خارجی: مطالعه موردی جمهوری اسلامی ایران و عربستان سعودی، پژوهش­های راهبردی سیاست. 7 (24)، 156- 125.
    • قائدی، حجت­الله، صلاحی، سهراب و پروین، خیراله(1400). ارزیابی سیاسی- حقوقی تحریم­های اقتصادی یک­جانبه امریکا علیه جمهوری اسلامی ایران، دانش سیاسی. 34، 546- 519.
    • مجتهدزاده، پیروز(1379). ایده­های ژئوپلیتیک و واقعیت­های ایرانی. تهران: نشر نی.
    • مشفق، زهرا(1401). تضعیف جایگاه ایران در کریدورهای بین‌المللی، امنیت اقتصادی. 10(3)، 48-27.
    • مطلبی کربکندی، محمدعلی و زارع زردینی، علی(1400). راهکارهای توسعه اقتصاد دریا محور در راستای نیل به اهداف اقتصاد مقاومتی، اقتصاد دفاع.6 (22)، 81-53.
    • مهکویی، حجت و باویر، حسن(1393). سازمان­های منطقه­ای در کاهش چالش­های منطقه­ای، مطالعه موردی سازمان همکاری اقتصادی(اکو) سازمان­های بین­المللی. (7)، 161-137.
    • نورعلی، حسن و احمدی، سید عباس(1401). واکاوی نقش ژئوپلیتیکی ایران در کریدورهای بین­المللی و ارائه مدل ایران، هارتلند کریدوری جهان، پژوهش­های جغرافیای انسانی. (3)، 187-161.
    • نوروزی، علیرضا و تقی­زاده، معصومه(1397). چالش‌ها و چشم­انداز کریدورهای حمل‌ونقل بین­المللی و عبوری از ایران (با تأکید بر کریدور شمال و جنوب)، معاونت اقتصادی اداره کل اقتصاد و دارایی استان گیلان، وزارت امور اقتصادی و دارایی

    وزارت راه و شهرسازی(1397). معرفی کریدورهای بین­المللی عبوری از ایران، تراسیکا؛ کریدوری در دل راه تاریخی ابریشم، به آدرس: http://news.mrud.ir/news/53966

    References

    • Arnold, J., & Dugin, A. (2018). Geopolitics: theories, concepts, schools and debates, transcrip pripered.‏
    • Begcecanli, B. (2021). S. Arabia becomes largest oil supplier to China in 2020. Anadolu Agency.‏
    • Crosetto, Guido. (2023). NBC news, A key U.S. ally wants to walk back its 'atrocious' embrace of China, available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/italy-suggests-exit-chinas-belt-road-shift-us-rcna97230
    • Elahi, N., Masoumzadeh, E., Kiaalhosseini, S. Z., & Arabi, S. H. (2020). Regionalism and its Economic Effects on Iran in a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model: A Case Study of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). International Economics Studies50(2), 29-46.‏
    • Fathollah-Nejad, A. (2021). Iran in an emerging new world order: From Ahmadinejad to Rouhani. Palgrave Macmillan.‏
    • Fedorenko, R., & Pokrovskaya, O. (2020, January). East-West transport corridor: issues of customs and logistics infrastructure development. In International Session on Factors of Regional Extensive Development (FRED 2019)(pp. 88-93). Atlantis Press.‏
    • Fulton, J. (2019). China’s changing role in the Middle East. The Atlantic Council.‏
    • Gawliczek, P., & Iskandarov, K. (2023). The Zangezur corridor as part of the global transport route (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region). Security and Defence Quarterly41.‏
    • Hulme, P. E. (2021). Unwelcome exchange: International trade as a direct and indirect driver of biological invasions worldwide. One Earth4(5), 666-679.‏
    • Hussain, I., Hussain, I., Ke, G., & Muhammadi, M. (2021). The Effects of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) on Regional Geopolitics. Geopolitics Quarterly17(64), 206-230.‏
    • Kildow Dr, J. T. (2008). Phase II Florida’s ocean and coastal economies report.‏
    • Kouhi-Esfahani, M. (2019). Iran's Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus: Relations with Azerbaijan and Armenia. Routledge.‏
    • Naji, S. (2011). Iran, the center of ‘strategic energy ellipse’: A geopolitical reality. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations3(1), 155-175.‏
    • Nakanishi, H. (2023). Impacts of the Second Karabakh War on the South Caucasus Region: Iran-Azerbaijan Relations. Global Resource Management, 26.‏
    • Ng, A. K., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2012). The geography of maritime transportation: Space as a perspective in maritime transport research. Maritime Policy & Management39(2), 127-132.‏
    • Noorali, H., & Ahmadi, A. (2022). Analysis of Iran's Geopolitical Role in International Corridors. Human Geography Research54(3), 1161-1187.‏
    • Noorali, H., & Ahmadi, S. A. (2023). Iran's new geopolitics: heartland of the world’s corridors. GeoJournal88(2), 1889-1904.‏
    • Okafor, L. E., Khalid, U., & Burzynska, K. (2022). Does the level of a country's resilience moderate the link between the tourism industry and the economic policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic?. Current Issues in Tourism25(2), 303-318.‏
    • Piriyev, H., Iskandarov Kh. and Tahirov R. (2022) The second Karabakh war. Military-political analysis. Baku: Military Publishing House
    • Rahim, S. A. (2019). Lapis Lazuli Corridor: Meeting the Economic Aspirations of Afghanistan and Member Countries. Management2(3), 67-78.‏
    • Rezapour, D., & Simbar, R. (2019). China's New Silk Road Initiative: Opportunities and Threats for Iran, Pakistan and Kazakhstan. International Political Economy Studies1(1), 157-186.‏
    • Rifaat, H. (2016). China, Iran, and One belt, one road, will Iran become drawn into China’s One Belt, One Road orbit in Pakistan. The Diplomat, October 25.‏
    • Roy, M. S. (2012). Iran: India’s Gateway to Central Asia. Strategic Analysis36(6), 957-975.‏
    • Sarker, M. N. I., Hossin, M. A., Yin, X., & Sarkar, M. K. (2018). One belt one road initiative of China: Implication for future of global development. Modern Economy9(4), 623-638.‏
    • Sarma, H. C. (2018). Turning the international North-South corridor into a “digital corridor”. Сравнительная политика9(4), 124-138.‏
    • Scobell, A. (2017). Why the Middle East matters to China. In China's Presence in the Middle East(pp. 9-23). Routledge.‏
    • Shah, A.; Kazmi, A. A.; Elahi, M. M.; Mushtaq, S.; Kiyani, A. I.; Jahangir, A.; Ali, S. (2015). Academic Session: Strategic Dimensions of CPEC.
    • Sletmo, G. K. (2001). The end of national shipping policy? A historical perspective on shipping policy in a global economy. International Journal of Maritime Economics3(4), 333-350.‏
    • Tanchum, Michaël.(2021). India’s Arab-Mediterranean Corridor: A Paradigm Shift in Strategic Connectivity to Europe. South Asia Scan 14
    • Tianyang, L. (2019). Belt & Road Initiative expands China-Iran cooperation. China Daily.‏
    • Tuna Aygün, Feyzullah.(2023).The Development Road: Connecting Iraq and Türkiye. The Center for Middle Eastern Studies (ORSAM). https://www.orsam.org.tr/en/the-development-road-connecting-iraq-and-turkiye/
    • Waheed Abbas, UAE-India bilateral trade reaches $60b in 2018-19, Khaleej Times, 4 July 2019, https://www.khaleejtimes.com/business/local/uae-india-bilateral-trade-reaches-60 b-in-2018-19.
    • Zheng, X. B., Kim, Y. S., & Shin, Y. R. (2021). Cost effectiveness analysis in short sea shipping: evidence from Northeast Asian routes. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering9(12), 1340.‏
    • https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/2016/economy/421456782

     

     

    Translated References into English

    • Aghajari, Mohammad Javad, & Rostamifar, Siminsadat. (2013). Saarc and its Effect on Regionalism. Studies of International Relations Journal (Political Science and International Relations Journal), 5(20), 9-39. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/247647/en. [In Persian]
    • Arghavani Pirsalami, F. and Pirankhou, S. (2017). ---. Foreign Relations, 9(3), 7-42. [In Persian]
    • Purahmady, H. (2010). Energy Diplomacy and National Interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Political Knowledge, 5(2), 5-40. doi: 10.30497/pk.2010.15. [In Persian]
    • Chatterjee, C. (2022). Economic Diplomacy and Foreign Policy (A. Arabpour, R. Tavakoli, & P. Hasani, Trans.). Tehran: Imam Sadiq University Press. [In Persian]
    • Saif, M. S., Azhdari, A. A., & Shojaei, S. (2018). The Role and Position of Marine Industries in Iran's Economy (With a Look at the Sixth Development Plan Law and Executive Solutions for Achieving Marine Industry Goals), Islamic Consultative Assembly Research Center, Energy, Industry, and Mining Studies Office (Industry Group). [In Persian]
    • Simbar, R. (2011). United States Foreign Policy and the New Sanctions Against I.R. Iran. Journal of Political Knowledge, 6(2), 107-138. doi: 10.30497/pk.2011.11. [In Persian]
    • Tayeb, A., & Bozorgi, V. (2017). Conflicting Theories in International Relations. Tehran: Qumes Publishing. [In Persian]
    • fathi, M. , Abdekhodaei, M. and shiravand, S. (2018). Zhngan code and geopolitical ties in foreign policy: the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia case. Political Strategic Studies, 7(24), 125-156. doi: 10.22054/qpss.2018.21444.1609. [In Persian]
    • Ghaedi, H. , Salahi, S. and Parvin, K. (2021). Political-legal assessment of US unilateral economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Political Knowledge, 17(2), 519-546. doi: 10.30497/pkn.2021.14534.2626. [In Persian]
    • Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2000). Geopolitical Ideas and Iranian Realities. Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
    • Moshfegh, Z. (2022). The Weakening of Iran's Position in International Corridors. Scientific Monthly "Economic Security", 10(3), 27-48. [In Persian]
    • Motallebi Korbekandi, M. A. and Zare Zardeyni, A. (2022). Strategies for the Development of Maritime Economy align with the Goals of a Resistive Economy. Journal of Defense Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(22), 53-81. [In Persian]
    • Mahkooy, H., & Bavir, H. (2014). Regional Organizations in Reducing Regional Challenges: A Case Study of the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), International Organizations, (7), 137-161. [In Persian]
    • Noorali, H. and Ahmadi, A. (2022). Analysis of Iran's Geopolitical Role in International Corridors. Human Geography Research, 54(3), 1161-1187. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2022.331764.1008388.[In Persian]
    • Nourozi, A., & Taqizadeh, M. (2018). Challenges and Prospects of International and Trans-Iranian Transport Corridors (with an Emphasis on the North-South Corridor), Economic Deputy of the Directorate General of Economy and Finance of Guilan Province, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance.[In Persian]
    • Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. (2018). Introduction of International Corridors Passing through Iran, TRASICA: A Corridor in the Heart of the Historical Silk Road. Retrieved from http://news.mrud.ir/news/53966. [In Persian]